Posts Tagged ‘recruitment’

What Are Employees Saying About Your Company?

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Anything good? Everything bad? On the heels of the long-celebrated – and notorious – F***edCompany.com, several workplace critique sites have popped up in the last few years. The latest to catch on are Glassdoor.com, and JobVent, both of which attempt to quantify ratings of the work environment. Like others, these sites rely on the comments and attitude ratings of current and former employees. JobVent actually makes an attempt at scoring the organization’s desirability as a workplace, whereas Glassdoor cultivates its registered users to cull more accurate ratings. Recently in the news, Jobs of the Damned is focused on collecting material for a book on bad bosses.

Like the ubiquitous RateMyProfessors.com and the broader issues associated with merchants and service providers profiled on Yelp, some question the reality behind the ratings, thinking that isolated and overly irritated employees will dominate postings and unfairly characterize a firm as a bad place to work. On the other hand, each of the sites named above contains glowing reviews of many employers.

So will the new transparency affect recruiting efforts at less-than-positive workplaces, or will this trend fade away like F’ed Company? And does your organization deserve its online profile?

Twitter and Facebook Recruitment Hazards

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

by Mark C. Healy

According to a recent Workforce Management piece, recruiting on the likes of Twitter and Facebook could lead to allegations of discrimination and get you into legal trouble. Quoting various attorneys, author Fay Hansen suggests that the social networking world is both too young and White, leading to a risky recruiting process; moreover, she suggests that recruiters are relying too much on their Tweets.

The logic is a little suspect. Unless hiring under the terms of a consent decree, most organizations aren’t under any specific limitations in their sourcing efforts. Moreover, discrimination claims come from applicants, who presumably responded to a posting or advertisement. As such, it would be hard to sue a company on the grounds of discriminatory sourcing if you, in fact, applied at that company.

Few recruiters report that they recruit exclusively through social networking sites. However, plaintiffs could possibly use the strategy as evidence of intentional discrimination in a disparate treatment claim. At the very least, spending time sourcing on such sites but ignoring traditional candidate pools is simply limiting your strategy.

A more relevant concern not mentioned is using Facebook and MySpace profiles to make decisions about candidates. It seems that this is a widespread practice, though no rigorous studies can pinpoint its prevalence or how fast it’s growing. Nonetheless, this is often an undocumented process, something a recruiter does in the margins of a hiring initiative, though many candidates don’t maintain much of a social networking presence.

Judge for yourself by clicking over to Workforce Management here and be sure to check out the rather opinionated comments.